10 Best Movies you Might Not Have Seen

Honorable Mentions: Garden State, Paprika, Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, Snatch, Kung Fu Hustle, Sunshine, A History of Violence, Dragon, Magnolia, Rush, The Great Dictator.
Note: This list is comprised of my own personal opinions, and consists of movies that you might not have seen.

Runner-Up: 25th Hour
To be honest, I think Spike Lee is one of the most over hyped directors to ever step behind a camera. Granted I haven't seen all his movie, but the only two that impressed me were "Do the Right Thing" and his most underrated film "25th Hour." The film follows a man named Montgomery during his last day of freedom before being sent to prison for seven years on drug charges. This movie does a lot of things right, Edward Norton's performance, the brilliant writing, and Lee's fantastic directing. But what made this movie stand out was some of the subject matter. It was one of the first big movies to really address the events of the attacks on 9/11. It also took a serious look at the hatred of America's so called "melting pot," and the inevitability of our own fates. Despite being arguably Lee's greatest film, "25th Hour" is one of his most overlooked. And if there's one reason to watch this movie, it would be Norton's "F*ck You" monologue.

10. Short Term 12
One of the newest movies on this list, "Short Term 12" has already been listed alongside some of the greatest independent films ever made. The film revolves around a couple who run a group home for troubled youths, and we see as the balance their own lives with the lives of these young people. Bursting onto the scene last year at South by Southwest, the movie was met with critical acclaim and has since gone on to win several awards. Despite that, it only managed to pull 1.6 million at the box office. This movie is an emotional roller coaster; at times it is uplifting and hopeful, and at others it is almost soul crushing that makes you content with the life you have. That's the sign of a great movie, one that can make you feel an array of emotions; and "Short Term 12" is a great movie.

9. Rope
"Rope" is straight up, an impressive piece of cinema. The movie is made up of mostly long shots, lasting from five to ten minutes. Never before have I seen a movie that felt so similar to a play, it really brings a unique aspect to a medium where we've seen just about every trick there is. Directed by Alfred Hitchcock, the movie is loosely based true events. It revolves around two friends who want to get away with the perfect murder. Not only do they want to get away with it, but they want to flaunt it. So they invite a bunch of people over for a dinner party while hiding the body in plain sight in a large chest. Hitchcock's most underrated film, "Rope" is one of the most suspenseful films I've ever seen. With such a great filmography underneath his arm, it really does say something about this movie when it's one of Hitchcock's best.

8. Trainspotting
Over the years director Danny Boyle has made some great movies, from "28 Days Later" to "Slumdog Millionaire;" but if you were to ask his fans what his best movie is, the most common answer would probably be "Trainspotting." Often cited as one of the greatest British films ever made, "Trainspotting" is a film that is truly unique. Imagine a funnier, far less depressing version of "Requiem for a Dream." The film follows a group of young, British heroin addicts as they struggle with their addiction while simultaneously trying to keep what little lives they have from falling apart. Despite the dark subject matter, the movie manages to have an often upbeat feel and consistently make you laugh alongside this group of weird and f*cked up characters. Despite being a commercial success, the film didn't receive the proper attention upon its release that it deserved; fortunately, the movie has garnered a cult following over the years, Both depressing and uplifting, "Trainspotting" is one of those movies that stays with you long after you watch it.

7. Moon
What may be the most underappreciated film of the 2000s, "Moon" is one of the most unique and intriguing science fiction movies in a long time. Taking place in the near future, a private energy company has set up a base on the dark side of the moon manned by a single astronaut to mine for Helium-3. Sam Bell has been stationed on the base to run the systems along with the bases artificial intelligence GERTY. After leaving the base and going out on the surface, the rover he is driving crashes and Sam is injured. Waking up at the base a few days later, Sam feels that something is wrong and sets to find out the truth. Filmed on a budget of only five million and grossing only ten, "Moon" is a gem. Fortunately, after its release on Netflix it has gained a cult following. If you ever have two free hours, this is a movie I can't recommend enough.

6. Synecdoche, New York
If I were to make a list of the most artsy, hipstery movies ever made, "Synecdoche, New York" may be at the top of that list; despite that, this is a really great movie. From the writer of "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" Charlie Kaufman, this is one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen. It revolves around a play write who receives a grant, and uses it to put on the ultimate show. Using the money, he rents out a massive warehouse, builds a city inside, and fills it with actors. He then spends years training the actors and to make the show perfect. Filled with motifs and complex themes, "Synecdoche, New York" was one of the best films of the decade and was actually named the best by Roger Ebert. Smart, confusing, and sheer genius, this is a movie that wasn't meant as entertainment but as artistic expression. 

5. Wake in Fright
Originally released in 1971, "Wake in Fright" was quickly lost to time. With almost all of the original film canisters missing and not being available on VHS or DVD, it became a legend of Australian cinema; but in the mid 2000s, a high quality copy was found in Pittsburgh. After some digital restoration, it was released on DVD a few years later. The film revolves around an Australian grade school teacher, who decides to take a trip to Sydney to see his girlfriend. On his was he stops at an area near the outback known as the Yabba. While there he gambles all his money away and is stuck alongside the crazy, drunk locals. The best way I can describe "Wake in Fright" is an Australian version of "Deliverance," minus the sodomy. Released and re-released to wide critical acclaim, the movie has garnered a reputation as one of the greatest lost films; despite the controversy of a particularly brutal scene involving the hunting of kangaroos. Unsettling, disturbing, and not for the faint of heart, "Wake in Fright" is an absolutely terrifying masterpiece.

4. The Before Trilogy
There are two trilogies I truly and undoubtedly love, "Lord of the Rings" and the "Before" trilogy. "Before Sunrise" in 1995, "Before Sunset" in 2004, and "Before Midnight" in 2014 tell the single greatest love story ever captured on camera. It tells the story of two young adults who met by choice and have a one night fling, they then meet many years later in very different places in their lives and rekindle the fire. With the series concluding as a legit couple with twins who want very different things with what is left of their lives. Each movie consists almost entirely of the two just talking, and each movie has some of the best dialog ever put into movies. The chemistry between the two leads Ethan Hawke and Julie Deply is unmatched in film history. One of the best film trilogies of all time, these are incredible movies that are worth the total 4.8 hour run time.

3. Mud
I always like to keep my eyes out for up and coming directors, and over the past few years the one young director who has stood out from the rest would be Jeff Nichols. First debuting with "Shotgun Stories" in 2008, and then "Take Shelter" in 2011 which was my pick for the best movie of the year. But his third film "Mud" is his crowning achievement. Feeling like it came straight out of a Mark Twain novel, what "Mud" does such a great job at is that it captures the American spirit, the sheer essence of what American life is like in lower economic class. That's what Jeff Nichols does so well; he can really make you relate to the characters. The hardships they go through, their hope and dreams, all the hard work. "Mud" was released in 2013 and while there were a lot of movies to come out that year, none were better than "Mud."

2. 12 Angry Men
Despite being nominated for three Oscars, winning several prestigious awards upon its release, and is often mentioned alongside some of the greatest movies of all time, not nearly enough people have seen this movie. Released in 1957, the film made only around one million dollars, which wasn't even a lot at the time. The movie revolves around a jury who are tasked with deciding the fate of a young man accused of murder. The entire jury seems content with sending him away, but when they put it to the vote one man defends him and believes they should spend more than five minutes on deciding whether a person is sentenced to death. Shot on a single set, "12 Angry Men" is an example of simplistic film making at its finest. It's just 12 men, sitting in a room and talking; yet, it's one of the most riveting films I've ever seen. I've always thought that movies from the 1950s tend not to have withstood the test of time very well, but concerning "12 Angry Men" it has aged wonderfully.

1. Once Upon a Time in the West
Every great director has a few great films, and Sergio Leone is no different; Sergio Leone was an Italian director who pioneered and mastered the spaghetti western genre. He's most known for creating the "Dollars" trilogy, featuring the quintessential spaghetti western "The Good, The Bad and the Ugly." Now the problem is that "TGTBATU" is so good, it overshadowed an arguably better movie. Released in 1968, "Once Upon a Time in the West" was the culmination of everything Leone had learned over his career. There are influences of his earlier work, as well as styles he displayed in his later movies; more refined and with a clearer vision, this is arguably the greatest western of all time. Only grossing a messily 5 million at the box office (a fifth of what "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" earned), this is one of the most unappreciated and overlooked movies of all time. While it has gained the respect that it deserved over the years, this is still a movie that not nearly enough people have seen.

5 Best Games of 2014

Honorable Mentions: Broken Age: Act One, The Walking Dead: Season 2, Monument Valley, The Banner Saga, Shovel Knight, The Vanishing of Ethan Carter, Jazzpunk, Dungeon of the Endless, Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel!, Infamous: Second Son, Destiny, The Last of Us: Left Behind, Bioshock Infinite: Burial at Sea Part Two, Tales From the Borderlands, Game of Thrones, Shadowrun: Dragonfall- Director's Cut, Nidhogg, Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft

Runner-Up: The Wolf Among Us

Since 2012, Telltale Games has established themselves the lead story tellers in the game industry. First making waves with their 2012 adaptation of the hit comic "The Walking Dead," their episodic series featuring player choices have become a hit. And despite the acclaim garnered by "The Walking Dead: Season One" and "Season two," many actually view "The Wolf Among Us" as their finest work. Based off the comic series "Fables;" all the fairy tales you've ever been told are true and over the years they have all migrated to New York City and live in secrecy, you play the big bad wolf who is the sheriff of this small community. One day you discover the grisly murder of one of your people, and are then dragged into a conspiracy that spreads throughout all of the fairy tales. "The Wolf Among Us" is one of the best mystery games I've played in a long time, and it shows the diversity that Telltale Games is capable of. It is unsure whether there will be a season two or not, all I know is that if there is I'll be downloading the first episode on day one.

5. Transistor
In 2011, independent developers Supergiant Games released their first game "Bastion;" a beautiful top down, action RPG with a unique narrative that went on to be one of the year's best. In 2013, they announced their follow up game "Transistor." Following a similar model, "Transistor" was released to wide acclaim. You play as a young woman named Red, a singer who was to be assassinated. Managing to survive only losing your voice, you find what appears to be a large sword that can communicate with you. Along with the sword, Red attempts to find out what happened and finish off those who tried to have her killed. Featuring a beautiful soundtrack, unique combat, a great narrative, and arguably the best art style of any game release in 2014, "Transistor" really is something special.

4. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
For the first time in as long as I've been a fan, we finally get a "Lord of the Rings" game that doesn't suck; not only that, it's just plain awesome. Developed my Monolith Productions, the game works as a mix between the combat of "Batman: Arkham City" and the free running of "Assassins Creed." Taking place on two separate large maps right outside of Mordor, you play as a ranger brought back from death that is seeking revenge against the monster responsible for the death of his family. Alongside the wraith who created the rings of power. Highlighted by great combat and surprisingly good story, "Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor" is one of the best games of the year and one I'd recommend to anyone interested.

3. Dark Souls 2
The "Souls" series have gained a rather unique following; it's a combination of sadists, try-hards, and overall angry people. Like its predecessors, the game is incredibly difficult. While not as hard as the previous game, I still managed to die just under 150 times during my first play through. "Dark Souls 2" is a RPG from a Japanese company called "From Software," who have developed the perfect form of sword and shield combat. What makes this game so great though is the challenging aspect it brings to the table. Too many games nowadays hold your hand through the entire game, "Dark Souls 2" breaks your hand and tells you to go kill a monster three stories tall. Some have complained that "Dark Souls 2" is dumbed down from the previous game, but I never saw that. I viewed it as more accessible to new players, and made several necessary changes to the game that just made it more fun. This was the first great game I played in 2014, and it is arguably one of the best.

2. Far Cry 4
2012's "Far Cry 3" is one of my favorite games of all time; it was ridiculous fun from start to finish. Ever since the announcement of the sequel, I couldn't have been more exciting. And after finally playing the game I can say that it lived up to my expectations. The game follows the story of Ajay Ghale, a young man from America who has traveled to his late mother's home country of Kyrat (a northern region of Nepal) to spread her ashes. You arrive only to find out that the country is engaged in a violent civil war and that your father was a leader of a local rebel group. Despite having nothing to do with the war, you are dragged into the middle of it and become the rebel's key weapon. What "Far Cry 4" does right, just like its predecessor, is that it's fun. This is a game I can see myself going back and playing several times over. An interesting story, solid mechanics, a beautiful world, tons of missions to accomplish, and endless replay value insure that this game is well worth the money.

1. Dragon Age: Inquisition
This was a game I had no plans on getting until I walked into Game Stop. Prior to its release, it received wide critical acclaim with many calling it the best game of the year. So along with "Far Cry 4" (which came out the same day), I decided to get. And after finishing the prologue, I was positive that it was going to be an amazing experience. Developed by Bioware, the game follows the player who is the sole survivor of a huge explosion that claimed many lives and ripped a hole between their world and the next. So along with a group of warriors, you are tasked with closing the rift before it consumes the earth. Whether you want an RPG, action adventure, or a dialog heavy game where your choices matter, "Dragon Age: Inquisition" has something for just about everyone. To be honest, 2014 hasn't been the best year for gaming; especially in wake of 2013 which featured several of the greatest games of all time. But if there is one game that truly stands out among the rest, it would be this one.

Tales From the Borderlands: Episode 1- First Impressions

   Over the past two years, the development studies Telltale Games has established themselves as one of the best development studies currently working. First making waves over the years with the well received "Sam & Max" games, they made it to the world stage with 2012's "The Walking Dead Season One" noted for its emotional story, complex characters, unique art style, and decision based dialog, the game was in instant success winning dozens of game of the year awards. In 2013, they launched "The Walking Dead Season Two" and a new series called "The Wolf Among Us," both of which received wide critical acclaim and concluded mid 2014. Telltale has already announced "The Walking Dead Season Three" as well as a "Game of Thrones Series," but it is their latest game that seemed to grab the most interest. Based off the hit series from Gearbox Software, "Tales From the Borderlands" brings an episodic and story heavy take to the over the top first person series shooter. And despite being completely different from the other games in the series, it works on every level.

     The story is played through two characters, Rhys and Fiona. Rhys works for Hyperion, a company working on the planet of Pandora. One day Rhys goes into his boss's office expecting a promotion, only to find a rival at the company has taken his boss's position. Hating Rhys just as much as Rhys hates him, he demotes Rhys to a janitor position. But while in the office, Rhys hears something interesting. Hyperion is looking to buy a vault key off of some guy who came upon it (on Pandora there are dozens of these vaults that contain untold treasures that can only be opened with a key. So Rhys and some of his friends decide to get the key for themselves and blackmail the company. At the same time, a young woman and con artist named Fiona, her sister, and their adoptive father are looking for the score of the century. Looking at a multi-million dollar pay out, they just have to fool a few suckers. Eventually their paths and Rhys cross, and they have to work together so everyone can get what they want. And as you can imagine, things don't go particularly smoothly.

     When I first heard about this game I was immediately interested; one of my favorite developers making a game in my favorite active series. I was apprehensive since it would be so different from the other games in the "Borderlands" series, all of which are first person shooters. I wasn't sure if Telltale's story driven, episodic style would mesh with this new world. To my surprise the game wasn't just as good as I hoped, it went far beyond my expectations. Now let me emphasize, this is not a review. Only the first episode has been released, this is more along the lines of a "first impressions." I hate when people review each episode in one of Telltale's games, it's like reviewing 1/5th of a movie. You have to wait until the game is completed and get a sense of the whole picture. This is just my thoughts on the first episode and will not include a score, but it may be foreshadowing for the entire season. But going off the first episode, if "Tales From the Borderlands" keeps this momentum it may turn into Telltale's best game, and certainly does the "Borderlands" series proud. One thing that "Borderlands" has always been known for is its sense of humor; it's crude, childish, in your face, and more often than not hilarious. "Tales From the Borderlands" captures that sense of humor perfectly, making it really feel like the other games in the series. One thing that I was really looking forward to returning to Pandora was to see some familiar faces. Chronologically, it actually takes place after all the other games; so just in the first episode there have already been a few old characters to make an appearance. Like almost all other Telltale games, the voice acting is spot on for both the new and old characters. Troy Baker and Laura Bailey take the leads as Rhys and Fiona and are both fantastic. It does help that their characters, along with a few of the other new ones, are so likable. It's also very interesting to play as two characters, switching back and forth between them. While they have their own stories, playing as them when their stories overlap adds something new. You'll learn something from one character that didn't learn while playing the other. It does help that the dialog is very good, both funny and interesting; it really keeps the story going. Telltale's previous games have almost nothing in common with any of the "Borderlands" games, except for the art style of all things. "Borderlands" is well known for their interesting cell shaded art style, which is very similar to other Telltale games like "The Walking Dead" and "The Wolf Among Us." Looking at "Tales From the Borderlands," it is gorgeous Telltale really hit the nail on the head and did a great job emulating the "Borderlands" style. But of everything that this game does right, there is one thing that helps it stand above many of Telltale's other games; they fixed the technical problems. Both "The Walking Dead" and the "Wolf Among Us" had outrageous technical issues including: freezes, frame drops, and incredibly slow load times. "Tales From the Borderlands" fixes those issues, most of which were nonexistent during my play through. There are some minor audio and visual issues like dialog not matching up with character animation, and two objects touching and phasing through each other; but nothing game breaking. If anything, the game’s biggest problem was that it is meant for "Borderlands" fans. If you play "The Walking Dead" or "The Wolf Among Us," you don't have to be fans of the work they're based off of to enjoy them. "Tales From the Borderlands" on the other hand kind of requires you to have played the previous games, and if you're not a fan of its sense of humor there isn't anything here for you. Overall, I loved episode one. It is a strong start to what looks to be an incredibly promising game. It's out now for most everything for five dollars, and is something that I'd highly recommend (especially if you have played any of the "Borderlands" games). "Tales From the Borderlands" is promising to say the least, and if the next four episodes keep it up this could be Telltale's best game. 

Pros: Has "Borderlands" since of humor, nice to see some old faces, great voice acting, fixed many technical issues other Telltale games have suffered from, good dialog, more intense combat than other Telltale games, likable new characters, "Borderlands" and Telltale's art style works great together, does "Borderlands" series proud, interesting playing as two characters.

Cons: Some audio and animation issues, really only for "Borderlands" fans.

Foxcatcher Review

     There are few things sadder than a once national hero treated like yesterday's news, a fate which seems too often fall on Olympic athletes. Every four years, these athletes come out and are treated like symbols of a nation but are then discarded. Many of the sports in the Olympics are not like basketball or baseball; people don't care most of the time. No one cares about gymnastics or swimming 99% of the time, they care about it for one month every four years. These people dedicate their lives to their sport for one shining moment every few years, and that's it; a fate that often falls upon wrestlers. While the sport of mixed martial arts has given an opportunity to high school and college wrestlers, the Olympics is the grandest stage of them all; but what happens when they have to step off the stage. 

     Former Olympic wrestling gold medalist Mark Schultz lives a monotonous life. His best years behind him, he spends his days practicing wrestling in the hopes of future success. While his brother Dave, also an Olympic gold medalist, has a family and can adjust to everyday life, Mark isn't the most social person in the world. One day, Mark receives from an employee of John E. du Pont, a multi-millionaire and sports enthusiast. Mister du Pont invites Mark to his compound; there he offers Mark a chance to train at the professional level. He will give Mark access to his facility and to build a team that could compete in the world championships as well as the Olympics. Mark agrees and attempts to get his brother to join, but he refuses to uproot his family. Mark wants to be the best in the world, and du Pont wants him to fulfill his dream and to help America achieve greatness. But Mark soon learns something is off with mister du Pont. 

     I had particularly high hopes for this movie ever since its debut at the Cannes film festival earlier this year, where it received overwhelming critical acclaim; director Bennett Miller even won the award for best director, and may I add well deserved. Just as I hoped, this movie is as great as the critics have been saying. This movie does a lot of things right, and I'll get to those, but let me first talk about the acting. Steve Carell and Channing Tatum, give career defining performances as John du Pont and Mark Schultz. They really lose themselves in these roles and take on their personas to a near perfect level. I would not be surprised if either of them gets nominated for a number of awards over the next few months. Years from now when we look back on their careers, this is the movie we will look back at. I also have to give credit to the makeup people; a lot of makeup and prosthetic were used on Carell to make him look more like du Pont and it looks great. Like I said earlier, director Bennett Miller did a great job with this movie, he had a clear vision of what this movie should have been and he accomplished that. This is only his third movie, the first two being "Capote" and "Moneyball" (both of which are great), but "Foxcatcher" has to be the best of the three; it is certainly the darkest of the three. The film is very emotional and may have a few people in tears by the end; it also does a great job in paying respect to the people that were involved. Sometimes movies based on true events don't do that, but "Foxcatcher" shows them as real people. One thing that is strikingly obvious is that the cinematography is top notch; it's obvious a lot of planning went into it and it gives the film a very particular look. One thing I'm so happy that the film did right was that it did a good job portraying the sport of wrestling. So often it's portrayed as ridiculous and only done among meat heads, but "Foxcatcher" does it with respect; and I appreciate that. Unfortunately though, "Foxcatcher" suffers from one serious problem, it's very slow. At no point was I ever bored, but the film has a very slow build up and takes a while to really get going; and by the end you start to feel the length of the film. There is also one problem that bothered me that I doubt anyone else in the theater noticed. In the film, they show footage from a mixed martial arts fight between Gary Goodridge and Paul Herrera in 1996. The problem is that the particular scene where it is shown takes place between 1987 and 1988. This one little continuity error that doesn't take anything away from the film, but was enough to bother me just a little. That aside, this is a wonderful movie. Fantastic acting, great directing, and beautiful cinematography all come together into greatness. With 2014 almost over and the December lineup looking pretty lackluster, "Foxcatcher" might be the last great movie of the year. 

Pros: Career defining performances from Steve Carell and Channing Tatum, great directing from Bennett Miller, excellent cinematography, great use of makeup on Carell, dark and emotional, does a good job portraying wrestling, pays respect to the actual events and those involved.

Cons: Pretty slow pace, one glaring continuity error.

4.5/5 Stars

Far Cry 4 Review

     In 2004, the first person shooter "Far Cry" was released to commercial and critical success. It was extremely over the top and warranted a sequel. In 2008 under the helm of a new studio, "Far Cry 2" was released and marketed as a gritty and realistic shooter; featuring mechanics like weapon degrade, vehicles that must be repaired when damaged, and malaria. While interesting, these new mechanics made the game tedious and sucked all the fun out of the series. So a few years later when the sequel "Far Cry 3" was announced many did not take notice; upon its release though, it was met with almost universal critical acclaim and was named one of the best games of the year by many publications. Personally, it became one of my all time favorite games. The personality, the amount of stuff you could do, and just how ridiculous it was at times worked perfectly together. The game also featured one of the best stand alone expansions ever made with "Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon." Since then I have been pining for the next game in the series; and after a long wait the highly anticipated sequel has arrived.

     The story follows the story of a young man named Ajay Ghale, who has decided to travel to a northern region of Nepal called Kyrat in order to spread the ashes of his recently deceased mother. Upon traveling to Kyrat, the bus he is on is attacked by several soldiers; soldiers working for the self proclaimed king of Kyrat, Pagan Min. Years ago Pagan attempted to make a name for himself in the Hong Kong crime scene but ultimately fails. After murdering his father he flees to Kyrat, where he uses his personal funds to hire a small, private army to help him take control when the country is in the middle of a civil war. Pagan was in love with Ajay's mother before she fled to the US, and after learning that he was coming to the country he decided to intervene. After kidnapping Ajay and his guide they are taken to Pagan palace; after getting away from Pagan, he is intersected by a local terrorist group called the golden path. Ajay's father (who died years ago) was the former leader of the group, so they feel they have an obligation to Ajay and save him. After seeing what Pagan has done to the area, he decides to join the group and fight Pagan's army; not just to fulfill his mother's final wish, but to help the people of the region who desperately need it.

     Going back to the beginning of the year, "Far Cry 4" might have been my most anticipated game of the year behind "Destiny." And while "Destiny" didn't quite live up to my expectations, "Far Cry 4" has. One aspect that really surprised me about both "Far Cry 4" and "Far Cry 3" is that it really works as a shooter, "Far cry 2" didn't really stand along some other FPS games at the time but the newer games really work. "Far Cry 4" just has really nice shooting mechanics, each weapon feels a bit different and you need to work with each weapon to get good at it. The game features a bow and it's arguably the best weapon in the game, but it's something you have to practice with to use effectively. "Far Cry 4" also has a lot more variety than its predecessor: weapons, mission, animals, and challenges are more diverse. In "Far Cry 3" you could put two attachments on a weapon as well as buy "signature" weapons that had more attachments. "Far Cry 4" features many more weapons, including many more "signature" weapons. The game also has a ton of stuff to do, there are hours upon hours of missions ranging from assassinations to hunting to bomb diffusion and many more. And with the hundreds of collectible, this is a game that will require a lot of time to beat 100%. One thing that I really loved about "Far Cry 3" was that it let you chose your play style. I always compare it to a game that came out the same year as it, "Dishonored." "Dishonored" was a stealth game that allowed you to beat it without having to kill a single enemy. The problem was that it gave you no incentive to do so; "Far Cry 3" on the other hand let you go in guns blazing or rewarded you for playing stealthy (which was more difficult). "Far Cry 4" continues with that tradition and gives you even more options to play how you want. The game has also added co-op, so you can now kill hundreds of enemy and animals with a friend. One thing that "Far Cry 3" vastly improved over its predecessor was that it had a much more interesting story and unique characters; "Far Cry 4" does the same thing but also has a much more likable protagonist. In "Far Cry 3" you played some rich kid who gets kidnapped and wants revenge against the people who killed your brother, while you see where he's coming from he usually just comes off as an asshole. The new character is someone you can actually get behind. Another thing that "Far Cry 4" has over the previous game would be the world it takes place in, the world of Kyrat is beautiful and expansive. The mountains, the forests, it really is one of the most beautiful open worlds I've played through in a while. But if there is one thing that "Far Cry 4" has really done right just like its predecessor, is that the game is just plain fun. It is one of the most enjoyable and satisfying games I have played this year and is something I will go back and visit many more times. Despite everything the game does right, it has two major flaws. First off would be the driving, I hate it, I don't like it. They changed up the driving controls so you can shoot and drive at the same time. The problem is that both acceleration and direction are tied to the left analog stick and is just a pain in the ass. Vehicles do have an auto-driving function that will keep you on a road, and without it driving would just be unbearable. But of anything the game suffers from the fact that it can't quite live up to its predecessor. "Far Cry 3" was so good and such a big surprise, and became a favorite for many people. "Far cry 4" is kind of like "Fallout: New Vegas" and "Saints Row 4;" while it makes some needed improvements, it doesn't act as a huge leap forward from its previous game. But while "Far Cry 4" might not be quite as good as "Far Cry 3," it’s still fantastic. In a year that hasn't featured a lot of great games, this one is a stand out. It's fun and features a world with tons of stuff to do. I really can't recommend this game enough; I've had a blast playing it thus far and will be putting a lot more time into it. There are still a few games set to be released in the next month and a half, but it safe to assume that "Far Cry 4" is one of the year's highlights. 

Pros: Solid shooting mechanics, interesting story, unique characters, beautiful and expansive world, tons of stuff to do, more variety than previous game, let's you gun blazing or rewards you to be stealthy, features co-op, more likable protagonist, just plain fun.

Cons: Driving isn't great, not a huge step up from "Far Cry 3," has trouble living up to its predecessor.

4.5/5 Stars

Note: I played this on the PS4 and had very few technical issues, none of which were close to game breaking. I have heard that both the PC and PS3 versions suffer from serious technical issues. So keep that in mind if you decide to buy this game.